Study analyzed self-reported function and symptoms, pinch-tip grip, and cervical ROM among 100 women with CTS—half received surgery; half received multimodal manual therapy
Physical therapy group showed significant gains over surgery group at 1 month for function, symptoms, and pinch-tip grip; no improvement in cervical ROM.
By 6 months, both groups were reporting similar improvements; similarly at 1 year, there were few differences
Connection between manual therapy and cervical ROM for patients with CTS was not confirmed; authors think it's possible a different intervention (neurodynamic) may lead to improvements in ROM in this population
Authors believe early gains by physical therapy group make physical therapy preferable to surgery as a way to return patients to normal activities as quickly as possible
Authors of a new study on carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) say that when you toss out the splints, steroid injections, lasers, and other treatments often lumped in with physical therapy as part of a "conservative" approach and focus solely on a debate about surgery vs specific multimodal physical therapy, physical therapy makes a compelling case for itself.
How compelling? Researchers found similar improvement in self-reported function and CTS symptom severity for both surgical and physical therapy patients after 1 year, but the physical therapy group reported more significant gains in the first month. That speedier gain early on is worth noting, researchers believe, because it allows these patients to return to work and other activities sooner than their peers who underwent surgery. Results were published in the Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy (abstract only available for free).
The study, conducted in Spain, focused on 100 women who had experienced CTS symptoms for at least a year including pain and paresthesia in the median nerve distribution, positive Tinel sign, and positive Phalen sign. Participants also underwent electrodiagnostic examination to verify deficits in sensory and motor median nerve conduction.
Once accepted into the program, the women were randomly divided into 2 groups of 50: 1 group received endoscopic decompression and release of the carpal tunnel through surgery, and 1 group received 3 treatment sessions of manual therapies that targeted areas "anatomically related to potential entrapment of the median nerve (eg, shoulder, elbow, forearm, wrist, and fingers)," as well as the cervical spine (more on that later). The specific techniques included:
Soft tissue compression over the pectoralis minor muscle
Longitudinal stroke over the biceps muscle
Transversal stroke of the bicipital aponeurosis
Dynamic stroke of the pronator teres muscle
Stretching of the transverse carpal ligament
Stretching of the palmar aponeurosis
Manual compression of the lumbrical muscles
Lateral glides applied to the cervical spine
Longitudinal stroke over the scalene muscles
Posteroanterior nonthrust mobilization of the mid cervical spine
Transversal stretching of the costoclavicle spine
Patients in the physical therapy group also received cervical spine exercises for stretching neck muscles, which they were encouraged to perform at home during the follow-up period as needed. Based on earlier studies by others, researchers hypothesized that patients with CTS were also experiencing limits on cervical range of motion and that manual therapy would show improvements in this area as well. Ultimately, the cervical work didn't result in any notable changes in cervical range of motion for the women in either group.
But a different story surfaced when it came to improvement in self-reported function as measured through the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), as well as pinch-tip grip force. The physical therapy group showed average 1-month gains that exceed those of the surgery group by nearly 1 point on the 5-point BCTQ scale. Pinch-tip grip force improvements also bettered the surgery group at the 1 month mark. When reassessed at 6 and 12 months, however, both groups posted similar scores on both assessments.
"The findings of the current study have potential clinical implications and open new lines of research," authors write. "Because better short-term outcomes were found with manual therapy, patients may be able to return earlier to their activities of daily living and work when they receive manual therapy, compared to those who undergo surgery."
While earlier studies tended to give surgery the edge over conservative treatments, those "conservative" approaches usually lumped in physical therapy with a host of ineffective treatments including splints, steroid injections, lasers, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Authors of the current study say theirs is the first to make a clean comparison between surgery and well-defined multimodal manual therapy.
As for the lack of change in cervical function, authors think there may still be a connection but that the interventions used in the research didn't provide "sufficient management of the neck impairments." Previous studies showing this connection employed neurodynamic interventions—something not used in the current study—and it's possible that had those interventions been used, improvements may have been gained, they write.